Post by Nitaidas on Feb 28, 2012 14:55:36 GMT -6
Atheist scientist, redefining “nothing” to avoid the philosophical conclusion that there is a creator God.
The article ends with these:
It gets worse.
If nothing is our past, it could also be our future. As the universe, driven by dark energy — that is to say, the negative pressure of nothing — expands faster and faster, the galaxies will become invisible, and all the energy and information will be sucked out of the cosmos. The universe will revert to nothingness.
Nothing to nothing.
One day it’s all going to seem like a dream.
But who is or was the dreamer?
N.Y. Times , 20/02/12, by Dennis Overbye
www.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/science/space/cosmologists-try-to-explain-a-universe-springing-from-nothing.html?_r=3
It seems the atheist scientists have all the interesting things to say. Theologians just feed us baloney. I am loving Greene's most recent book on parallel universes. What a feast for the mind! And some of it might really be true.
. There is no idea there which he can get. This research on multi-verse is not a universe that 600,000 yojanas wide. That way you can say even atom was known in Greece or India. There is a difference between the concept of "atom" then and the mathematical description of it now.