|
Post by vkaul1 on Aug 12, 2011 11:40:49 GMT -6
I would have probed it deeper, but like I pointed out its insignificance makes it harder for me to spend time doing that. There maybe some truth to what he says, but I doubt that it was completely an inside job. The scientific explanations to debunk 9/11 conspiracy theories are decent, at least in cursory reading.
Otherwise, too many people find that even Michael Cremo makes decent points against evolution. However, we are required to dig deep and find out how wrong he is. As we have limited time and energy, let us focus on investigating paranormal activity rather than 9/11. I just brought this to your attention, so that we are also aware of red flags against Griffins.
|
|
|
Post by vkaul1 on Aug 14, 2011 12:42:49 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by vkaul1 on Aug 16, 2011 12:25:03 GMT -6
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm2Jrr0tRXk&feature=player_embedded#at=331What do you think of this video especially 28 minutes onwards, Nitai ji? Good video from Harris. I am not completely convinced by his arguments though. Some good quotes from Radhakrisnan on Indian scriptures: As Dr. Radhakrishnan put it "So numerous are their suggestions of truth and so varied their guesses at God, that almost anybody may seek in them what he wants and find what he seeks." "The Indian thinkers first arrive at a system of consistent doctrine and then look about for texts of an earlier age to support their position. They either force them into such support or ingeniously explain them away.
|
|